🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested to deploy the Insurrection Act, a statute that permits the commander-in-chief to deploy armed forces on American soil. This step is seen as a strategy to manage the deployment of the National Guard as courts and governors in urban areas with Democratic leadership continue to stymie his efforts.

Is this permissible, and what are the implications? Here’s what to know about this historic legislation.

What is the Insurrection Act?

The Insurrection Act is a US federal law that gives the president the ability to utilize the troops or federalize National Guard units inside the US to suppress internal rebellions.

The law is commonly called the 1807 Insurrection Act, the period when President Jefferson enacted it. But, the modern-day law is a combination of regulations established between 1792 and 1871 that describe the function of US military forces in domestic law enforcement.

Usually, US troops are prohibited from performing civil policing against American citizens aside from emergency situations.

The law permits military personnel to engage in internal policing duties such as making arrests and executing search operations, roles they are typically restricted from performing.

A professor noted that National Guard units cannot legally engage in standard law enforcement unless the president initially deploys the Insurrection Act, which permits the utilization of military forces domestically in the event of an civil disturbance.

This step raises the risk that troops could end up using force while acting in a defensive capacity. Moreover, it could be a precursor to further, more intense troop deployments in the time ahead.

“No action these troops can perform that, for example law enforcement agents opposed by these rallies could not do independently,” the source said.

Past Deployments of the Insurrection Act

The statute has been deployed on dozens of occasions. It and related laws were utilized during the rights movement in the sixties to defend protesters and learners ending school segregation. The president sent the 101st airborne to the city to protect students of color integrating the school after the state governor mobilized the national guard to block their entry.

Since the civil rights movement, however, its use has become “exceedingly rare”, based on a report by the federal research body.

George HW Bush used the act to address unrest in LA in 1992 after officers filmed beating the African American driver Rodney King were acquitted, leading to deadly riots. The state’s leader had asked for armed assistance from the president to control the riots.

Trump’s Past Actions Regarding the Insurrection Act

Trump suggested to deploy the act in the summer when the state’s leader took legal action against the administration to block the use of troops to support federal immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, calling it an “illegal deployment”.

During 2020, Trump asked governors of multiple states to send their National Guard units to the capital to control rallies that emerged after the individual was killed by a officer. Several of the executives complied, deploying units to the DC.

At the time, Trump also suggested to invoke the act for protests after Floyd’s death but ultimately refrained.

While campaigning for his second term, he suggested that this would alter. The former president informed an audience in the state in last year that he had been prevented from deploying troops to quell disturbances in locations during his previous administration, and said that if the issue came up again in his second term, “I’m not waiting.”

He has also promised to send the national guard to help carry out his border control aims.

The former president said on this week that so far it had not been required to deploy the statute but that he would consider doing so.

“The nation has an Insurrection Act for a purpose,” the former president stated. “If lives were lost and courts were holding us up, or state or local leaders were impeding progress, sure, I’d do that.”

Debates Over the Insurrection Act

The nation has a strong US tradition of keeping the federal military out of public life.

The nation’s founders, following experiences with misuse by the British military during the colonial era, feared that granting the commander-in-chief total authority over military forces would erode civil liberties and the electoral process. According to the Constitution, governors usually have the right to keep peace within state borders.

These values are reflected in the Posse Comitatus Law, an historic legislation that typically prohibited the troops from engaging in police duties. The law functions as a legislative outlier to the Posse Comitatus Act.

Civil rights groups have repeatedly advised that the law provides the chief executive extensive control to employ armed forces as a domestic police force in ways the framers did not anticipate.

Judicial Review of the Insurrection Act

Courts have been hesitant to question a commander-in-chief’s decisions, and the appellate court recently said that the commander’s action to deploy troops is entitled to a “significant judicial deference”.

However